<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quiz Yourself about Missing Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/quiz-yourself-about-missing-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/quiz-yourself-about-missing-data/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quiz-yourself-about-missing-data</link>
	<description>Statistical Consulting, Resources, and Statistics Workshops for Researchers in Psychology, Sociology, and other Social and Biological Sciences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/quiz-yourself-about-missing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/?p=987#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>Hi Anthony,

Thanks for the impassioned response.  Hopefully, your colleague will find out sooner or later that she does need solid statistical training even if she doesn&#039;t want to be a statistician.  And hopefully she won&#039;t be up against an important deadline when it happens.  :-)

You&#039;re right about data cleaning, of course, even beyond missing data.  The integrity of your data is absolutely vital.

I just started to write a very long response about a personal experience I had with data integrity, but I think it&#039;s actually a whole post.  Lol.

But I&#039;m glad that you get it.  You will be well served.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anthony,</p>
<p>Thanks for the impassioned response.  Hopefully, your colleague will find out sooner or later that she does need solid statistical training even if she doesn&#8217;t want to be a statistician.  And hopefully she won&#8217;t be up against an important deadline when it happens.  <img src='http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about data cleaning, of course, even beyond missing data.  The integrity of your data is absolutely vital.</p>
<p>I just started to write a very long response about a personal experience I had with data integrity, but I think it&#8217;s actually a whole post.  Lol.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m glad that you get it.  You will be well served.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/quiz-yourself-about-missing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/?p=987#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>I find this issue extremely important, and it is ridiculous that instructors in some basic and intermediate statistics courses do not stress the importance of cleaning the data or new methods of dealing with missing data.  Prior knowledge of data preparation is essential to the overall generalization of one&#039;s analysis, and measurement results.

For example, a fellow dissertation colleague is purposing to conduct a multiple regression analysis and refuse to consider preparing her data.  She seems to think that because the scale she is using does not go into specifics such as data preparation it is not needed.  She simply will collect data and apply the scale thinking her parametric analysis will provide her with substantive results.  Perhaps so, but will the result be valid?  Perhaps, I doubt it /Not…

Ironically, when I mentioned your training, and my interest to complete stats III she insisted that she is not interested in being a statistician.  However, now that she is being told to dig deeper with her analysis, and that she is confronted with terms she does not understand.  She calls me, and repeatedly I ask her about how she is going to clean her data - let alone deal with missing data points.

Her response is I am not at that point or level and when I get there I will research that stuff; well she thinks I will be there for her.

Missing Data Imputation is an essential tool, but if one does not understand or want to accept that this tool is of no use if they do not understand why it is more effective than simply using mean replacement, or other data deletion methods.  It makes more sense when one knows how to clean the data manually, thus the mechanics of this tool can be easier to grasp.

Knowing the type of missingness, and the acceptable missing limits is important.

Do not get me started, because as you know I will begin not to make sense, because my mind moves faster than I type.  That I will send before reading and the rest is; well, is History against MY-story

Hello Karen, how are you doing?

Thanks
Anthony H Brown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this issue extremely important, and it is ridiculous that instructors in some basic and intermediate statistics courses do not stress the importance of cleaning the data or new methods of dealing with missing data.  Prior knowledge of data preparation is essential to the overall generalization of one&#8217;s analysis, and measurement results.</p>
<p>For example, a fellow dissertation colleague is purposing to conduct a multiple regression analysis and refuse to consider preparing her data.  She seems to think that because the scale she is using does not go into specifics such as data preparation it is not needed.  She simply will collect data and apply the scale thinking her parametric analysis will provide her with substantive results.  Perhaps so, but will the result be valid?  Perhaps, I doubt it /Not…</p>
<p>Ironically, when I mentioned your training, and my interest to complete stats III she insisted that she is not interested in being a statistician.  However, now that she is being told to dig deeper with her analysis, and that she is confronted with terms she does not understand.  She calls me, and repeatedly I ask her about how she is going to clean her data &#8211; let alone deal with missing data points.</p>
<p>Her response is I am not at that point or level and when I get there I will research that stuff; well she thinks I will be there for her.</p>
<p>Missing Data Imputation is an essential tool, but if one does not understand or want to accept that this tool is of no use if they do not understand why it is more effective than simply using mean replacement, or other data deletion methods.  It makes more sense when one knows how to clean the data manually, thus the mechanics of this tool can be easier to grasp.</p>
<p>Knowing the type of missingness, and the acceptable missing limits is important.</p>
<p>Do not get me started, because as you know I will begin not to make sense, because my mind moves faster than I type.  That I will send before reading and the rest is; well, is History against MY-story</p>
<p>Hello Karen, how are you doing?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Anthony H Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Answers to the Missing Data Quiz</title>
		<link>http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/quiz-yourself-about-missing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Answers to the Missing Data Quiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/?p=987#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>[...] Great Resources for Your Literature Review Quiz Yourself about Missing Data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Great Resources for Your Literature Review Quiz Yourself about Missing Data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

