• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
The Analysis Factor

The Analysis Factor

Statistical Consulting, Resources, and Statistics Workshops for Researchers

  • Home
  • Our Programs
    • Membership
    • Online Workshops
    • Free Webinars
    • Consulting Services
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Our Core Values
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • Employment
    • Collaborate with Us
  • Statistical Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Login

Cohort and Case-Control Studies: Pro’s and Con’s

by Karen Grace-Martin 16 Comments

Two designs commonly used in epidemiology are the cohort and case-control studies. Both study causal relationships between a risk factor and a disease. What is the difference between these two designs? And when should you opt for the one or the other?

Cohort studies

Cohort studies begin with a group of people (a cohort) free of disease. The people in the cohort are grouped by whether or not they are exposed to a potential cause of disease. The whole cohort is followed over time to see if the development of new cases of the disease (or other outcome) differs between the groups with and without exposure.

For example, you could do a cohort study if you suspect there might be a causal relationship between the use of a certain water source and the incidence of diarrhea among children under five in a village with different water sources.

You  select a group of children under five years, either all children of that age in the village, a random sample taken from the population register, or e.g. children living in the same area, or attending the same clinic. Then you  classify them as either using the suspected water source or other water sources. You check e.g. after two weeks whether the children have had diarrhea.

You can then calculate how many diarrhea cases there were among those children using the suspected water source and those using other sources of water supply (cumulative incidence of diarrhea).

Case-control studies

The same problem could also be studied in a case-control study. A case-control study begins with the selection of cases (people with a disease) and controls (people without the disease).  The controls should represent people who would have been study cases if they had developed the disease (population at risk).

The exposure status to a potential cause of disease is determined for both cases and controls. Then the occurrence of the possible cause of the disease could be calculated for both the cases and controls. To come back to the example, you may compare children who present themselves at a health center with diarrhea (cases) with children with other complaints, for example acute respiratory infections (controls). You determine which source of drinking water they had used.  Then calculate the proportion of cases and controls that were exposed to the suspected water source.

Pro’s and con’s

On what basis do you decide to choose a cohort design or a case-control design?

Cohort studies provide the best information about the causation of disease because you follow persons from exposure to the occurrence of the disease. With data from cohort studies you can calculate cumulative incidences. Cumulative incidences are the most direct measurement of the risk of developing disease.

An added advantage is that you can examine a range of outcomes/diseases caused by one exposure. For example, when heart disease, lung disease, renal disease are caused by smoking.

However, cohort studies are major undertakings. They may require long periods of follow-up since disease may occur a long time after exposure. Therefore, it is a very expensive study design.

Cohort studies work well for rare exposures–you can specifically select people exposed to a certain factor.  But this design does not work for rare diseases–you would then need a large study group to find sufficient disease cases.

Case-control studies are relatively simple to conduct. They do not require a long follow-up period (as the disease has already developed), and are hence much cheaper. This design is especially useful for rare diseases (as you select the cases yourself), but not for rare causes (as you will probably not find these in sufficient number in your study). It is also very suitable for diseases with a long latent period, such as cancer.

However, case-control studies are less adept at showing a causal relationship than cohort studies. They are more prone to bias.

One example is recall bias:  cases might recall certain exposures more clearly than controls, simply due to the fact that they have thought about what could have caused their disease.

by Annette Gerritsen, Ph.D.

About the Author: With expertise in epidemiology, biostatistics and quantitative research projects, Annette Gerritsen, Ph.D. provides services to her clients focussing on the methodological soundness of each phase of an epidemiological study to ensure getting valid answers to the proposed research questions. She is the founder of Epi Result.


The Pathway: Steps for Staying Out of the Weeds in Any Data Analysis
Get the road map for your data analysis before you begin. Learn how to make any statistical modeling – ANOVA, Linear Regression, Poisson Regression, Multilevel Model – straightforward and more efficient.

Tagged With: case-control study, Cohort Study, Study design

Related Posts

  • Member Training: Writing Study Design and Statistical Analysis Plans
  • Eight Data Analysis Skills Every Analyst Needs
  • Great Resources for Your Literature Review
  • The Literature Review: The Foundation of Any Successful Research Project

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John says

    December 2, 2020 at 2:18 pm

    Thank a a lot for simple explaining it clearly.

    Reply
  2. Namusubo sarah says

    March 31, 2020 at 2:47 am

    So clear

    Reply
  3. Navdeep kaur dosanjh says

    March 24, 2020 at 11:49 pm

    what would be best study design to find out causal relationship between lung cancer and smoking?

    Reply
  4. Redwood middle school student says

    February 4, 2019 at 8:32 pm

    Super clear love it I’m only in eighth grade. I’m doing science Olympiad and this really helped me for disease detectives!!

    Reply
  5. a student says

    June 5, 2018 at 1:17 am

    The article is very easy to understand. Thank you very much!!!!

    Reply
  6. adan says

    March 21, 2018 at 5:12 am

    well understood thanks

    Reply
  7. researchstudent says

    November 14, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    This was so helpful! Clear and concise.

    Reply
  8. H.Zakari says

    May 10, 2017 at 10:45 am

    the article is well simplified for easy understanding. Thanks.

    Reply
  9. Jeewaranga says

    July 14, 2014 at 1:49 pm

    Well written, simple and clear explanation. I m no longer confused now!
    Thanks

    Reply
  10. Sarumpaet says

    November 4, 2013 at 1:53 am

    Dear Annette Gerritsen, could you please explain the difference of interpretation between RR in cohort study and OR in case control study? I have read some books but it’s still not clear.

    Best regards,

    Sarumpaet Sori Muda

    Reply
  11. MORAA ALICE says

    September 14, 2013 at 4:24 am

    The article is clear,well written and easy to understand

    Reply
  12. Paul Jiya says

    April 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm

    Wonderful work!!! Very clear than wat we were taught n class…….

    Reply
  13. Rose zawadi says

    April 16, 2013 at 2:50 pm

    This article helped me much,it is self explanatory
    Thank you.

    Reply
  14. Chetami says

    February 13, 2013 at 5:37 am

    The article is clear. However, I would like you to help me on the methodology of a study that I would like to do.

    I would like to do an intervention whereby I was thinking that data in the registers before the intervention would be used as a baseline and after the intervention would compare the treatment outcomes for baseline and end-line.

    May you help me with how best can I can put this idea on paper?

    Regards

    Reply
  15. sadia habib says

    December 21, 2012 at 8:09 pm

    This article is really well written .It helped me alot to solve my confusion.thanks

    Reply
  16. Gideon Quarshie says

    October 14, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    This article is well written out. It helped me answer questions on mid term take home exams. Thank you very much.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that, due to the large number of comments submitted, any questions on problems related to a personal study/project will not be answered. We suggest joining Statistically Speaking, where you have access to a private forum and more resources 24/7.

Primary Sidebar

This Month’s Statistically Speaking Live Training

  • Member Training: Analyzing Pre-Post Data

Upcoming Free Webinars

Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models for Count Data

Upcoming Workshops

  • Analyzing Count Data: Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Other Essential Models (Jul 2022)
  • Introduction to Generalized Linear Mixed Models (Jul 2022)

Copyright © 2008–2022 The Analysis Factor, LLC. All rights reserved.
877-272-8096   Contact Us

The Analysis Factor uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience of our website. If you continue we assume that you consent to receive cookies on all websites from The Analysis Factor.
Continue Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT