• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
The Analysis Factor

The Analysis Factor

Statistical Consulting, Resources, and Statistics Workshops for Researchers

  • Home
  • About
    • Our Programs
    • Our Team
    • Our Core Values
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • Employment
    • Guest Instructors
  • Membership
    • Statistically Speaking Membership Program
    • Login
  • Workshops
    • Online Workshops
    • Login
  • Consulting
    • Statistical Consulting Services
    • Login
  • Free Webinars
  • Contact
  • Login

Inter Rater Reliability–A Few Good Resources

by Karen Grace-Martin 4 Comments

Inter Rater Reliability is one of those statistics I seem to need just seldom enough that I forget all the details and have to look it up every time.

Luckily, there are a few really great web sites by experts that explain it (and related concepts) really well, in language that is accessible to non-statisticians.

So rather than reinvent the wheel and write about it, I’m going to refer you to these really great sites:

  • Computing Intraclass Correlations (ICC) as Estimates of Interrater Reliability in SPSS by Richard Landers
  • Statistical Methods for Rater and Diagnostic Agreement by John Uebersax

If you know of any others, please share in the comments.  I’ll be happy to add to the list.

Tagged With: inter rater agreement, inter rater reliability

Related Posts

  • What is Kappa and How Does It Measure Inter-rater Reliability?
  • Member Training: Practical Advice for Establishing Reliability and Validity
  • What Is Reliability and Why Does It Matter
  • 3 Tips to Make Interpreting Moderation Effects Easier

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paul van Haard says

    April 4, 2019 at 12:38 pm

    Dear Mrs. Grace-Martin,

    Please advocate Krippendorff’s alpha and the 95%CI for the population, which can be easily calculated in R (2019 CRAN) via scripts available.

    Solid arguments in favour for this broadly applicable IRR test can be found in the papers from Krippendorff.

    kind regards
    Paul
    BioStatistician/ Clinical Biochemist

    Reply
    • daniel klein says

      May 9, 2019 at 5:06 pm

      Before advocating Krippendorff’s alpha, note that solid arguments can be made against it (e.g., Zhao et al. 2018). Actually, all arguments for using Krippendorff’s alpha that I have come across are made by its author. I am not aware of a single paper by another author that empirically shows how alpha is superior to other inter-rater-reliability measures.

      Gwet (2014) shows that Krippendorff’s alpha is mathematically almost identical to Fleiss version of the kappa coefficient (especially when there are no missing ratings). Therefore, it shares some of the shortcomings of kappa: most notably, Krippendorff’s alpha (re-)produces the so-called high agreement low kappa paradox (cf. Feinstein and Cicchetti 1990).

      Concerning the confidence interval estimation proposed by Krippendorff has also been criticized (Zapf et al. 2016). The authors propose using the standard bootstrap method while Gwet (2014) suggests yet another variance estimator.

      Moreover, Gwet (2014) also shows how various other coefficients can be extended to multiple raters, any level of measurement, and handling missing values just like Krippendorff’s alpha. Thus, contrary to common claims, the latter is all but unique in these respects.

      References

      Gwet, K. L. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring
      the Extent of Agreement Among Raters. 4th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced
      Analytics.

      Feinstein, A. R., and D. V. Cicchetti. 1990. High agreement but low kappa: I. The
      problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 43: 543–549.

      Zapf, A., S. Castell, L. Morawietz, and A. Karch. 2016. Measuring inter-rater reliability
      for nominal data—Which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? BMC
      Medical Research Methodology 16: 93

      Zhao, X., Feng, G., Liu, J., and Ke Deng. 2018. We agreed to measure agreement – Redefining reliability de-justifies Krippendorff’s
      alpha. China Media Research, 14: 1-15. (Authors’ final version:
      https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7797/4ed9a814bb6f647ea10b1d74fde3bc061016.pdf)

      Reply
  2. Sean Murphy says

    April 6, 2016 at 1:22 pm

    Conceptual, not computation focused overview…
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402032/

    Good overview of reliability in general and how IRR fits into that picture…
    http://www.personality-project.org/r/book/Chapter7.pdf

    Computational resources and explanations using Excel.
    http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/

    Not free, but the book here is worth getting if you need to think through reliability in greater depth. There are a few free R functions available on the site for computing various IRR statistics and importantly generalizations that handle missing data. The R functions work well, I have not used the software. The book is quite comprehensive and well organized with worked examples in online spreadsheets.
    http://www.agreestat.com

    Also a couple of classic papers…
    Shrout and Fleiss (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
    http://www.aliquote.org/cours/2012_biomed/biblio/Shrout1979.pdf

    McGraw and Wong (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (Unfortunately this is behind a pay wall, but a good article if you have library access.)
    http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1996-03170-003

    Reply
  3. Joshua Cruz says

    April 10, 2015 at 5:13 am

    Thanks for the great resources. I found another one that was really helpful (also by a Karen)

    http://www.bibb.k12.ga.us/cms/lib01/GA01000598/Centricity/Domain/105/Interrater%20Reliability%20Article_1.pdf

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that, due to the large number of comments submitted, any questions on problems related to a personal study/project will not be answered. We suggest joining Statistically Speaking, where you have access to a private forum and more resources 24/7.

Primary Sidebar

Free Webinars

Effect Size Statistics on Tuesday, Feb 2nd

This Month’s Statistically Speaking Live Training

  • January Member Training: A Gentle Introduction To Random Slopes In Multilevel Models

Upcoming Workshops

  • Logistic Regression for Binary, Ordinal, and Multinomial Outcomes (May 2021)
  • Introduction to Generalized Linear Mixed Models (May 2021)

Read Our Book



Data Analysis with SPSS
(4th Edition)

by Stephen Sweet and
Karen Grace-Martin

Statistical Resources by Topic

  • Fundamental Statistics
  • Effect Size Statistics, Power, and Sample Size Calculations
  • Analysis of Variance and Covariance
  • Linear Regression
  • Complex Surveys & Sampling
  • Count Regression Models
  • Logistic Regression
  • Missing Data
  • Mixed and Multilevel Models
  • Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis
  • Structural Equation Modeling
  • Survival Analysis and Event History Analysis
  • Data Analysis Practice and Skills
  • R
  • SPSS
  • Stata

Copyright © 2008–2021 The Analysis Factor, LLC. All rights reserved.
877-272-8096   Contact Us

The Analysis Factor uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience of our website. If you continue we assume that you consent to receive cookies on all websites from The Analysis Factor.
Continue Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.