The great majority of all regression modeling explores and tests the association between independent and dependent variables. We are not able to claim the independent variable(s) has a causal relationship with the dependent variable. There are five specific model types that allow us to test for causality. Difference in differences models are one of the five.
An extremely useful area of statistics is a set of models that use latent variables: variables whole values we can’t measure directly, but instead have to infer from others. These latent variables can be unknown groups, unknown numerical values, or unknown patterns in trajectories.
In your typical statistical work, chances are you have already used quantiles such as the median, 25th or 75th percentiles as descriptive statistics.
But did you know quantiles are also valuable in regression, where they can answer a broader set of research questions than standard linear regression?
In standard linear regression, the focus is on estimating the mean of a response variable given a set of predictor variables.
In quantile regression, we can go beyond the mean of the response variable. Instead we can understand how predictor variables predict (1) the entire distribution of the response variable or (2) one or more relevant features (e.g., center, spread, shape) of this distribution.
For example, quantile regression can help us understand not only how age predicts the mean or median income, but also how age predicts the 75th or 25th percentile of the income distribution.
Or we can see how the inter-quartile range — the width between the 75th and 25th percentile — is affected by age. Perhaps the range becomes wider as age increases, signaling that an increase in age is associated with an increase in income variability.
In this webinar, we will help you become familiar with the power and versatility of quantile regression by discussing topics such as:
Join us on this webinar to understand how quantile regression can be used to expand the scope of research questions you can address with your data.
Note: This training is an exclusive benefit to members of the Statistically Speaking Membership Program and part of the Stat’s Amore Trainings Series. Each Stat’s Amore Training is approximately 90 minutes long.
Mediators can affect the relationship between X and Y. Moderators can affect the scale and magnitude of that relationship. And sometimes the mediators and moderators affect each other.
Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are incredibly useful tools for working with complex, multi-layered data. But they can be tough to master.
In this follow-up to October’s webinar (“A Gentle Introduction to Generalized Linear Mixed Models – Part 1”), we’ll cover important topics like:
– Distinction between crossed and nested grouping factors
– Software choices for implementation of GLMMs (more…)
Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are incredibly useful—but they’re also a hard nut to crack.
As an extension of generalized linear models, GLMMs include both fixed and random effects. They are particularly useful when an outcome variable and a set of predictor variables are measured repeatedly over time and the outcome variable is a binary, nominal, ordinal or count variable. These models accommodate nesting of subjects in higher level units such as schools, hospitals, etc., and can also incorporate predictor variables collected at these higher levels.
In this webinar, we’ll provide a gentle introduction to GLMMs, discussing issues like: (more…)