I sometimes get asked questions that many people need the answer to. Here's one about non-parametric anova. Question: Is there a non-parametric 3 way ANOVA out there and does SPSS have a way of doing a non-parametric anova sort of thing with one main independent variable and 2 highly influential cofactors?

In Part 6, let’s look at basic plotting in R. Try entering the following three commands together (the semi-colon allows you to place several commands on the same line). x <- seq(-4, 4, 0.2) ; y <- 2*x^2 + 4*x - 7 plot(x, y)

When you use the menus in SPSS, you're really taking a shortcut. You're telling SPSS which syntax commands, along with which options, you want to run. Clicking OK at the end of a dialog box will run the menu options you just picked. You may never see the underlying commands that SPSS just ran. If instead you hit Paste, those command won't automatically be run, but will instead the code to run those commands will be copied into the Syntax window.

Mediation indicates that a mediator M is the causal link in the effect between an independent variable X and a dependent variable Y. How to test mediation has become a very hot topic of statistical research in the past 10 years, and there are many new advances.

You will notice that, for example, both procedures have a FIXED and a RANDOM subcommand. The FIXED subcommand lists the fixed effects. The only really differences are that in GENLINMIXED you have to put EFFECTS= and you have to specify that you do want an intercept.

The ratio of the between-cluster variance to the total variance is the Intraclass Correlation. It tells you the proportion of the total variance in Y that the clustering accounts for. You can also interpret it as the correlation among observations within the same cluster.

Item Response Theory (IRT) refers to a family of statistical models for evaluating the design and scoring of psychometric tests, assessments and surveys. It is used on assessments in psychology, psychometrics, education, health studies, marketing, economics and social sciences — assessments that involve categorical items (e.g., Likert items).

Exp[-0.812 - (+0.281)] = 0.33, even more unlikely to be £2, increased likelihood (now 3x) of being >2 I don’t understand what is different because it is still the same result, only there is no instruction in the SPSS output about subtracting the coefficients from thresholds.

You can see that indeed, all the coefficients (Estimate column) are identical, but with opposite signs. Except the intercepts, which are identical. Mystery Solved As it turns out, SPSS and Stata did something clever. SAS and Minitab parameterize the model in the usual way—the same way any regression model does:

There are dozens of measures of association. Even just correlations come in many flavors: Pearson, Spearman, biserial, tetrachoric, squared multiple, to name a few. And there are many measures beyond correlation.