• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
The Analysis Factor

The Analysis Factor

Statistical Consulting, Resources, and Statistics Workshops for Researchers

  • Home
  • Our Programs
    • Membership
    • Online Workshops
    • Free Webinars
    • Consulting Services
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Our Core Values
    • Our Privacy Policy
    • Employment
    • Collaborate with Us
  • Statistical Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Login

Odds Ratio: Standardized or Unstandardized Effect Size?

by Karen Grace-Martin Leave a Comment

Effect size statistics are extremely important for interpreting statistical results. The emphasis on reporting them has been a great development over the past decade.

When most journal editors ask for effect size statistics, they mean standardized effect size statistics. That is, effect size statistics that are free of units of measurement.

Examples include correlation coefficients, eta-square, omega-squared, Cohen’s d. There are many others, but these are common.
But they’re not the only kind. And they’re not always the most useful kind.

Unstandardized effect size statistics also measure the size of the effect. They’re in the original units of the variables. Regression coefficients, mean differences, and covariances are all unstandardized.

They’re useful too, especially if the units are meaningful.

But what about odds ratios?

Odds Ratios (OR) are sometimes standardized, but not always.

What makes common effect sizes standardized

Let’s first look at two similar standardized effect size statistics to see why this happens with odds ratios.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient is probably the first standardized effect size statistic you learned, though no one may have called it that.

It describes the strength of the linear relationship between two numerical variables. It is standardized because in its denominator, we divide by the standard deviations of BOTH variables. This removes both variables’ units.

We’re left with a correlation coefficient that ranges from -1 to 1. Once you get used to correlations a bit, they’re not hard to interpret.

Cohen’s d is another common standardized effect size statistic. It’s used to describe the relationship between a categorical predictor and a numerical outcome. We remove the units of Y, the numerical outcome, just like we did in the correlation: divide by its standard deviation.

We don’t need to remove units for X, the binary grouping variable, because grouping variables don’t have units.

Cohen’s d values have a lower limit at 0 and no upper limit. But as you gain experience working with them, you can get an idea of how to interpret how large they are. (Please don’t blindly use Cohen’s original rules-of-thumb: S, M, L. They were never intended to work in all areas of research.)

Why Odds Ratios are sometimes standardized

Odds Ratios work just like Cohen’s d. There is one binary variable, but this time it’s the outcome, Y.

If X is also categorical, the OR will naturally be standardized. There are no units of X or Y. I’ve seen sources say that OR are standardized for this reason. They assume X is categorical. This might be common in some fields, where there is always a comparison between treatment and control.

But when X is numerical, the odds ratio will have units by default. I don’t know of any statistical software that will give you a standardized version of an odds ratio.

However, it’s not hard to do yourself. Simply remove the units of any numerical Xs by dividing each X by its standard deviation before putting it into the analysis. None of the resulting odds ratios on your output will have units.

Understanding Probability, Odds, and Odds Ratios in Logistic Regression
Despite the way the terms are used in common English, odds and probability are not interchangeable. Join us to see how they differ, what each one means, and how to tame that tricky beast: Odds Ratios.

Tagged With: effect size statistics, odds ratio, standardized effect size, unstandardized

Related Posts

  • The Difference Between an Odds Ratio and a Predicted Odds
  • Logistic Regression Analysis: Understanding Odds and Probability
  • Effect Size Statistics in Logistic Regression
  • Effect Size Statistics: How to Calculate the Odds Ratio from a Chi-Square Cross-tabulation Table

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that, due to the large number of comments submitted, any questions on problems related to a personal study/project will not be answered. We suggest joining Statistically Speaking, where you have access to a private forum and more resources 24/7.

Primary Sidebar

This Month’s Statistically Speaking Live Training

  • Member Training: Introduction to SPSS Software Tutorial

Upcoming Free Webinars

Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models for Count Data

Upcoming Workshops

  • Analyzing Count Data: Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Other Essential Models (Jul 2022)
  • Introduction to Generalized Linear Mixed Models (Jul 2022)

Copyright © 2008–2022 The Analysis Factor, LLC. All rights reserved.
877-272-8096   Contact Us

The Analysis Factor uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience of our website. If you continue we assume that you consent to receive cookies on all websites from The Analysis Factor.
Continue Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT