This month’s Topic Webinar

Communicating Statistical Results:
When to use tables vs graphs to tell the data’s story
with guest instructor Isabella R. Ghement, Ph.D.

In this webinar, we will discuss when tables and graphs are (and are not) appropriate and how people tend to engage with each of these media.

We will then review principles for designing good tables and graphs and present examples of statistical tables and graphs that meet these principles.

Finally, we will show that the choice between tables and graphs is not always dichotomous: tables can be incorporated into graphs and vice versa.

Participants in this webinar will learn how to bring more thoughtfulness to the process of deciding when to use tables and when to use graphs in their work and will be exposed to design principles and examples they can adopt to create better tables and graphs.

About the instructor

Dr. Isabella Ghement is the principal of Ghement Statistical Consulting Company Ltd., an independent statistical consulting and training firm in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.

Since 2006, Dr. Ghement has provided statistical consulting and training to clients from government, academia and industry. Her research expertise covers areas such as partially linear regression modeling, robust regression modeling and mixed treatment comparisons.

Dr. Ghement has presented a number of R short courses at conferences and an advanced regression course using R to graduate students in the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia.

Dr. Ghement is a member of the Steering Committee for the American Statistical Association’s Conference on Applied Statistical Practice 2017, where she chairs the Short Courses and Tutorials Sub-Committee.

Dr. Ghement obtained her Ph.D. in Statistics from the University of British Columbia in 2005 with a thesis on the application of partially linear models with correlated errors to the study of the health effects of air pollution in Mexico City.

Topic Webinar: Wed, May 18, 2016 3:00 PM – 4:30 PM EDT (GMT -4)

Note: this webinar is available to Data Analysis Brown Bag members.

DABB_logoCould you use some affordable ongoing statistical training with the opportunity to ask questions about statistical topics? Consider joining our Data Analysis Brown Bag program.


April 2016 Topic Webinar: An Introduction to Kaplan-Meier Curves

In this talk, you will see a simple example of this using fruit fly data, and learn how to interpret the Kaplan-Meier curve to estimate survival probabilities and survival percentiles..

Read the full article →

The four models you meet in Structural Equation Modeling

On a previous post (Why do I need to have knowledge of multiple regression to understand SEM?) we showed how a multiple regression model could be conceptualized using Structural Equation Model path diagrams. That’s the simplest SEM you can create, but its real power lies in expanding on that regression model. Here I will discuss 4 ways to do that..

Read the full article →

Zero One Inflated Beta Models for Proportion Data

Like logistic and Poisson regression, beta regression is a type of generalized linear model. It works nicely for proportion data because the values of a variable with a beta distribution must fall between 0 and 1. It’s a bit of a funky distribution in that it’s shape can change a lot depending on the values of the mean and dispersion parameters. Here are a few examples of the possible shapes of a beta distribution, with different means and variances…

Read the full article →

Five things you need to know before learning Structural Equation Modeling

By Manolo Romero Escobar If you already know the principles of general linear modeling (GLM) you are on the right path to understand Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). As you could see from my previous post, SEM offers the flexibility of adding paths between predictors in a way that would take you several GLM models and […]

Read the full article →

When to Check Model Assumptions

If any of these fail, it’s nearly impossible to get normally distributed residuals, even with remedial transformations.

Types of variables that will generally fail these criteria include:

Categorical Variables, both nominal and ordinal.
Count Variables, which are often distributed as Poisson or Negative Binomial.

Read the full article →

Structural Equation Modeling: What is a Latent Variable?

So we infer these constructs, which are unobserved, hidden, or latent, from the data we collect on related variables we can observe and directly measure.
Latent refers to the fact that even though these variables were not measured directly in the research design they are the ultimate goal of the project..

Read the full article →

March 2016 Topic Webinar: Inter-Rater Reliability

How do we determine if raters are consistent in their ratings or if a new instrument performs as well as the established ‘Gold Standard’?

Read the full article →

Measures of Predictive Models: Sensitivity and Specificity

With any model, you’re never going to hit 100% accuracy. And if you’re wrong, there’s a tradeoff between tightening standards to catch the thieves and annoying your customers..

Read the full article →

How To Calculate an Index Score from a Factor Analysis

One common reason for running Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or Factor Analysis (FA) is variable reduction. In other words, you may start with a 10-item scale meant to measure something like Anxiety, which is difficult to accurately measure with a single question. You could use all 10 items as individual variables in an analysis–perhaps as predictors in a regression model. But you’d end up with a mess..

Read the full article →